Garay Law
Free Initial Consultation
Call us at | 800-499-1341

Orange County Employment Law Blog

Equal pay and workplace sex discrimination in California

California employers are forbidden to discriminate in the workplace against a worker due to his or her gender in addition to a number of other protected statuses. One aspect of the prohibition is the mandate that an employer may not pay someone less for the same work or in the same position as his or her opposite-sex counterpart. Unfortunately, despite the provisions of the law, sex-based pay discrimination still continues to occur in California and in other states across the country.

According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, sex-based discrimination occurs when a person is treated less favorably due to his or her sex. Unlike other types of discrimination cases, someone who is alleging a violation of the equal pay provisions is able to file a case directly in court without having to go through the EEOC's complaint and investigation process first.

Religious discrimination in the workplace

In California and around the country, those working for employers who are subject to federal anti-discrimination laws have the right to remain free from religious discrimination in the workplace. Religious discrimination can take the form of being treated unfairly due to the person's beliefs or because that person is married to or associated with someone who is part of a particular religion. This means that a person cannot be discriminated against because of their religion in all aspects of employment, including training, hiring, firing or fringe benefits.

In addition to employment aspects, federal law also requires employers to respect and accommodate the person's religious practices, as long as they are within reason. In order to accomplish this, the employer may be required to make adjustments that allow for this accommodation. The only instance an employer may not be required to accommodate a person's religious beliefs or practices is if doing so would cause a major disruption to the operations of the company.

Genetic information discrimination in employment

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is responsible for enforcing federal anti-discrimination laws that pertain to employment and investigating complaints of violations from California and throughout the country. These laws prohibit various types of discrimination, including the use of genetic information. Specifically, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 prohibits genetic information discrimination in employment.

Under federal employment law, the protected category of genetic information includes information about an employee's or applicant's genetic tests, family medical history and involvement by either the individual or that person's family in genetic services or related clinical research. Additionally, the genetic information of someone's own or family member's fetus or embryo is protected. It is forbidden to use genetic information in employment decisions, since such information has no relevance to work ability. GINA limits requests for genetic information and permits disclosure in a limited number of circumstances. All aspects of employment, including hiring, terminations, salary, promotions or demotions, fringe benefits and more, are protected by the law.

Workplace harrasment and discrimination

Employees in California may benefit from reviewing the laws enforced by the state's Department of Fair Employment and Housing. The laws are designed to protect workers from illegal harassment and discrimination based on several factors such as race, a disability, marital status, ancestry, age, religion, sex and sexual orientation, among others. California law places a number of requirements on employers to help minimize the likelihood of these adverse events from occurring at the workplace.

The California Fair Employment and Housing Act prohibits the harassment of employees and prohibits employers from limiting the use of any language at workplace, unless essential for sustaining business. Still, employers are required to inform employees of any language restriction and the penalties for any infractions. The laws also require employers to take reasonable measures to prevent harassment or discrimination from occurring at the workplace. State law requires employers to inform workers on the nature of sexual harassment, its illegality and any legal remedies available.

The steps to take when filing a complaint against an employer

Employees in California who feel as if they have been discriminated against may file a complaint against their employer with the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement. The process begins by filing DLSE Form RC1, which may be downloaded from the Internet and is available in multiple languages. When filling out the form, it is important to provide all of the information that it asks for.

Failure to fill out the form in its entirety may delay the process of filing the claim and potentially resolving the problem. If there are any documents that the complainant wishes to attach to the form, only copies should be sent. This is because there is a risk that a document could be lost during the claim process. Forms should be signed and dated by the person making the complaint and mailed to the correct address.

The EEOC outlines disability discrimination

People in California may benefit from learning more about how the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission defines disability discrimination in the workplace. This type of discrimination occurs when an employer or other organization that is subject to the terms of the Americans with Disabilities Act or Rehabilitation Act treats someone unfavorably due to a disability. According to the EEOC, mistreating someone for having history of a disability or a temporary disability is considered to be discrimination.

Federal law requires employers provide reasonable accommodation to people with disabilities unless it creates an undue hardship. The acts also prohibit employers from discriminating against disabilities in any aspect of employment, making it unlawful to harass an employee or a job applicant for having any past, permanent or temporary disability.

Coca-Cola Bottling Company accused of labor law violations

In a complaint filed on Aug. 24, BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company is accused of intentionally misclassifying employees' status under the Fair Labor Standards Act to avoid paying overtime wages. The lead plaintiff claims he and other employees were misleadingly given managerial job titles though their primary duties were non-managerial in nature. The lawsuit also alleges that the company fails to provide meal and rest breaks to employees.

The lawsuit against the Los Angeles-based bottling company alleges violations of California labor laws, specifically the hour laws that mandate employees be paid a rate one-and-a-half times their regularly hourly wage for time worked in excess of eight hours in a day or 40 hours in a week. Overtime was not paid to the plaintiffs because they were classified as exempt employees. This classification was an inaccurate one, the complaint alleges, since the employees had little or no supervisory tasks. Plaintiffs are seeking an injunction against the company. They are also seeking damages, penalties and costs.

LinkedIn to pay employees for damages and overtime

Workers in California and three other states will receive unpaid wages plus damages from LinkedIn after the company failed to pay its workers for hours worked and overtime. A company representative attributes the error to some managers and employees lacking the proper tools to track their time. LinkedIn will pay the 359 affected employees a total of $3.35 million in wages and $2.51 million in damages. In addition, the company is making sure its employees receive a copy of its overtime policy and conducting compliance training.

The company says that it was already taking steps to address its error when the U.S. Department of Labor stepped in. A representative from the Department of Labor said that this situation is too common in the American workforce and that companies must be committed to complying with labor laws. Furthermore, employees should be informed about their rights.

Target sued for alleged workplace discrimination

People in California who shop at Target might be interested to learn that an employee is suing the company, alleging racial discrimination as well as disability discrimination. According to the lawsuit, the employee has worked for Target since 1993. Although he has dyslexia, autism and two rods in his back that limit mobility, he is still able to do his job. However, the workplace discrimination suit alleges that his mostly black co-workers have made work difficult for the plaintiff, who is white, by changing his schedule around and assigning him inferior tasks.

In 2011, the worker complained about how he was being treated and subsequently had his hours cut from between 35 to 40 hours per week to only five, according to the plaintiff. He said this reduction made him lose his benefits. The court filing states that mistreatment began in 2009, but when the plaintiff reported the incidents that allegedly involved co-workers and his supervisor to human resources, the abuse worsened. He stated that he was harassed and taunted more than before.

Yahoo executive faces sexual harassment suit

According to a recent report, a former female employee of Yahoo has filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against a female executive at the company, which has headquarters in Sunnyvale, California. The woman, who worked as a software engineer, alleges that a executive harassed her and that the executive's behavior eventually lead to her termination.

This lawsuit follows a number of accusations of sexual harassment by employees at various tech companies. In one case, a former Tinder executive also filed a lawsuit after being sexually harassed. Recently, the CEO of Urban Airship was accused of sexual assault and took a leave of absence from his post.

Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.